7 Simple Fixes for Awkward Sentences in Everyday Writing | Angela Nancy
- Angela Nancy

- May 6
- 13 min read
We've all been there, right? You're writing an email, a report, or even just a quick text, and suddenly, the sentence just feels... off. It's clunky, hard to follow, or just plain awkward. It happens to everyone, and honestly, it can be a little frustrating. But the good news is that fixing these common writing hiccups doesn't have to be a huge ordeal. There are some really simple ways to fix awkward sentences in everyday writing that can make a big difference in how clear and professional you sound. Let's look at a few common culprits and how to easily sort them out.
Key Takeaways
Watch out for comma splices, where two complete sentences are joined only by a comma.
Run-on sentences, which jam too many ideas together without proper punctuation, can be split up.
Dangling and misplaced modifiers can confuse your reader; make sure your descriptive phrases clearly connect to what they're describing.
Switching from passive voice to active voice often makes sentences shorter and more direct.
Cutting out unnecessary words can make your writing much sharper and easier to read.
1. Comma Splice
Okay, let's talk about the comma splice. It's one of those little grammar hiccups that can make your writing sound a bit jumbled if you're not careful. Basically, a comma splice happens when you use only a comma to join two complete sentences. Think of it like this: you have two independent thoughts, and you've just slapped a comma between them instead of giving them their own space or a proper connector.
For example, "The dog barked loudly, the mailman ran away." Both "The dog barked loudly" and "the mailman ran away" are full sentences on their own. They can stand alone. But sticking just a comma between them? That's the splice.
The biggest issue with comma splices is that they can confuse your reader, making it hard to tell where one idea ends and the next begins.
So, how do we fix this? There are a few ways, and they're pretty straightforward:
Use a period: This is the simplest fix. Just end the first sentence and start a new one. So, "The dog barked loudly. The mailman ran away." Easy peasy.
Use a semicolon: If the two sentences are closely related, a semicolon can work wonders. It's like a softer stop than a period. "The dog barked loudly; the mailman ran away." This shows the connection between the two events.
Use a coordinating conjunction: These are words like 'and,' 'but,' 'or,' 'so,' 'for,' 'nor,' and 'yet.' You can add one after the comma. "The dog barked loudly, and the mailman ran away." This creates a smooth flow.
Rewrite the sentence: Sometimes, you can restructure the sentence entirely to avoid the splice. Maybe one clause can become part of the other, or you can use a subordinating conjunction.
Fixing comma splices isn't about being a grammar snob; it's about making your writing clear and easy for others to read. It helps your message land without tripping over punctuation.
It's easy to fall into this habit, especially when you're writing quickly or trying to capture a stream of thought. But taking a moment to check for these little errors can really improve your writing and make your ideas shine through.
2. Run-on Sentence
Okay, let's talk about run-on sentences. These are the ones that just keep going and going, like a train with no brakes. Basically, you've got two or more complete thoughts (independent clauses) that are jammed together without proper punctuation or a connecting word. It can make your writing feel rushed and hard to follow.
Think of it like this:
Independent Clause 1: The dog barked loudly.
Independent Clause 2: The cat ran up the tree.
A run-on sentence would smash these together, maybe like: "The dog barked loudly the cat ran up the tree." See how that feels? It's a bit breathless and confusing.
The biggest problem with run-on sentences is that they can change the meaning of what you're trying to say, or at least make it much harder to understand.
So, how do we fix these sentence monsters? There are a few ways:
Use a Period: This is the simplest fix. Just separate the complete thoughts into two distinct sentences. "The dog barked loudly. The cat ran up the tree." Clean and clear.
Use a Comma and a Coordinating Conjunction: You know those little words like 'and,' 'but,' 'or,' 'so,' 'for,' 'nor,' and 'yet'? You can use one of these after a comma to join two independent clauses. "The dog barked loudly, and the cat ran up the tree.
Use a Semicolon: A semicolon is like a super-comma. It can join two closely related independent clauses. "The dog barked loudly; the cat ran up the tree."
Use a Subordinating Conjunction: This turns one of the independent clauses into a dependent clause, making it part of the other sentence. Words like 'because,' 'although,' 'since,' 'when,' or 'if' work here. "Because the dog barked loudly, the cat ran up the tree."
It's really about making sure each complete thought gets its own space or is clearly connected to the next one. Getting this right makes a huge difference in how easy your writing is to read. You can find more tips on how to fix these sentence clarity issues.
Sometimes, when we're writing quickly, our thoughts just tumble out one after another. It's natural, but it's our job as writers to go back and organize them so the reader doesn't get lost in the jumble. Think of it as tidying up your thoughts on paper.
3. Dangling Modifier
Okay, so let's talk about dangling modifiers. These are those sneaky little phrases that seem to be describing something, but they end up attached to the wrong thing, or worse, nothing at all. It's like showing up to a party and complimenting the host's dog, but you're actually talking to the mailman. Confusing, right?
A dangling modifier is a descriptive phrase that doesn't clearly or logically connect to the noun it's supposed to modify.
Think about it this way:
Having finished the assignment, the TV was turned on.
Who finished the assignment? The TV? Probably not. The sentence implies the TV did the finishing, which is, well, absurd. To fix this, you need to make sure the subject of the phrase is the same as the subject of the main clause.
Here are a few ways to untangle these:
Add the missing subject: Make it clear who or what is doing the action in the introductory phrase. For example, "Having finished the assignment, I turned on the TV." Now it makes sense.
Move the modifier: Sometimes, you can just rearrange the sentence so the modifier is right next to the word it's supposed to describe.
Rewrite the sentence: If it's really tangled up, sometimes starting over is the easiest path.
Let's look at another one:
Walking down the street, the buildings looked enormous.
Again, who is walking? The buildings? No. The sentence needs a subject.
Walking down the street, I thought the buildings looked enormous.
See? Much better. It's all about making sure your descriptive bits are actually describing what you think they are. It's a common slip-up, but once you know what to look for, you can spot them a mile away and fix them easily.
These kinds of errors can really throw your reader off track. They might pause, reread, and get a bit frustrated trying to figure out what you actually meant. Keeping your modifiers in check makes your writing smoother and your message clearer.
4. Passive Voice
Okay, let's talk about the passive voice. It's one of those things that can sneak into your writing and make it sound a bit… off. You know, like when you read a sentence and it feels like it's taking forever to get to the point? That's often the passive voice at work.
Basically, in a passive sentence, the subject isn't doing the action; it's receiving it. Think about it: "The ball was thrown by the pitcher." The ball isn't doing any throwing, right? It's just getting thrown. The pitcher is the one doing the action, but they're kind of shoved to the end of the sentence.
The main issue with passive voice is that it can make your writing less direct and sometimes harder to follow. It can also make it sound more formal or distant, which might be what you want sometimes, but usually, you're aiming for clarity.
Here's a quick way to spot it:
Look for forms of the verb "to be" (is, am, are, was, were, be, being, been).
See if a "by" phrase follows the verb, indicating who or what is doing the action.
Ask yourself: Is the subject of the sentence doing the action, or is the action happening to it?
Let's look at some examples:
Passive Sentence | Active Sentence |
|---|---|
The report was completed by the team. | The team completed the report. |
Mistakes were made. | I made mistakes. (Or: We made mistakes.) |
The cake will be eaten by the children. | The children will eat the cake. |
See the difference? The active versions are shorter and punchier. They tell you who did what right away. It's generally a good idea to use the active voice whenever you can for clearer communication [0f77].
Sometimes, you might use the passive voice on purpose. Maybe you don't know who did the action, like in "The window was broken." Or maybe you want to emphasize the thing that received the action, like in "The patient was treated successfully." That's fine! But for everyday writing, sticking to the active voice will usually make your sentences stronger and easier for your readers to understand [0a10].
When you're writing, try to make your subjects the doers of the action. It's a simple shift that can make a big difference in how clear and engaging your writing feels. Think about who or what is performing the verb and try to put that front and center in your sentence.
5. Wordy Phrase
Sometimes, we just use too many words to say something simple. It's like trying to carry a whole stack of books when you only need one. This happens a lot with phrases that don't really add much meaning. Think about sentences like, "Due to the fact that it was raining, we decided to stay inside." That's a mouthful, right? We could just say, "Because it was raining, we stayed inside." See? Much cleaner.
The goal is to make your writing as clear and direct as possible.
Here are some common culprits and how to fix them:
Due to the fact that" / "Because of the fact that": Just use "because" or "since."
"In order to": Usually, you can just use "to."
"At this point in time" / "At the present time": "Now" or "currently" works just fine.
"For the purpose of": "For" is often all you need.
"In the event that": "If" is usually sufficient.
It's easy to fall into these habits, especially when you're trying to sound more formal or professional. But often, the simpler version is stronger. Think about it: if you can say something in five words instead of fifteen, why wouldn't you? It makes your writing easier to read and understand. It's about being efficient with your words, not about using fewer words just for the sake of it. It's about making every word count. You can find more tips on cutting down on unnecessary words here.
Sometimes, the simplest phrasing is the most effective. Don't be afraid to cut out words that don't serve a purpose. Your readers will thank you for it.
Consider this example: "It is important to note that the new policy will be implemented next week." This sentence has seven words before it gets to the actual point. We can trim it down to: "The new policy will be implemented next week." That's a lot more direct. It's not about being lazy with your writing; it's about being respectful of your reader's time and attention. When you remove unnecessary words, you're not just making your sentences shorter; you're making them punchier and more memorable. It's like clearing away clutter so the main message can shine through. This approach helps your writing feel more natural and less like you're trying too hard to impress. It's about getting your point across clearly and concisely, which is what good writing is all about. This focus on clarity is something that authors like Alison Atkinson often highlight in their work, emphasizing how real-life experiences and straightforward advice connect best with readers.
6. Misplaced Modifier
Okay, so sometimes we write sentences that sound a little… off. Like maybe the description is attached to the wrong thing. That’s a misplaced modifier. It’s when a word or phrase meant to describe something ends up describing something else entirely, usually because it’s just in the wrong spot in the sentence. It can lead to some pretty funny, or at least confusing, images.
Think about this: "I saw a dog on the way to the store with a wagging tail." Was the store wagging its tail? Probably not. The phrase "with a wagging tail" is meant to describe the dog, but it’s placed after "the store," making it sound like the store has a tail. Oops.
Here’s how to fix it:
Move the modifier closer to what it’s describing. In the example above, you’d want to say, "On the way to the store, I saw a dog with a wagging tail." Now it’s clear the dog is the one wagging its tail.
Be specific. Sometimes, the modifier itself is vague. Instead of "He bought a used car from a salesman with a bad reputation," try "He bought a used car from a salesman who had a bad reputation." This makes it clear who has the bad reputation.
Check your sentence structure. If a descriptive phrase is at the beginning of the sentence, make sure it clearly connects to the subject that follows. For instance, "Running quickly, the bus was missed by Sarah." This implies the bus was running quickly. It should be, "Running quickly, Sarah missed the bus."
Misplaced modifiers can really mess with your meaning. It’s like trying to give directions and accidentally sending someone to the wrong town. The key is to place your descriptive words and phrases right next to the nouns they’re supposed to modify. It’s a simple fix that makes a huge difference in how clear your writing is. You can find more tips on correcting grammar if you’re still struggling with these kinds of errors.
7. Fragmented Clause
Okay, let's talk about fragmented clauses. These are basically sentence fragments, which means they're incomplete sentences. They often leave the reader hanging, wondering what's supposed to happen next. Think of them as a thought that's been cut off mid-sentence. They might be missing a subject, a verb, or even a complete thought.
For example, "Running down the street." Who is running? What are they running from or towards? It's a fragment. Or, "Because it was raining." This tells us why something might have happened, but not what happened. It leaves you waiting for the main part of the sentence.
The easiest way to fix a fragmented clause is to connect it to a complete sentence. You can either attach it to the sentence that comes before it or the one that comes after it, depending on what makes the most sense logically.
Here are a few common types of fragments and how to fix them:
Dependent clauses starting with subordinating conjunctions: Like "because," "although," "since," "if," "when," "while." These clauses can't stand alone.Fragment: "Although the weather was bad."Fix: "Although the weather was bad, we decided to go for a walk."
Phrases without a subject or verb: These are just groups of words that don't form a complete thought.Fragment: "Walking to the store."Fix: "She was walking to the store."
Phrases that look like sentences but lack a main verb: Sometimes you'll see a participle (a verb form ending in -ing or -ed) acting as the main verb, but it needs a helping verb.Fragment: "The book on the table."Fix: "The book on the table is mine."
It's easy to spot these once you know what to look for. Just remember, a complete sentence needs a subject, a verb, and to express a complete thought. If it's missing any of those, it's probably a fragment that needs a little help to become a full sentence. Fixing these little bits makes your writing so much clearer and easier for people to follow. You can find more information on identifying and fixing sentence fragments if you need a deeper dive.
Sometimes, a fragment can be used for effect, like in creative writing or dialogue, to create a certain rhythm or emphasize a point. However, in most everyday writing, clarity is key, and fragments can just make things confusing. Stick to complete sentences for smooth reading.
Sometimes, sentences can feel a bit jumbled, like a puzzle with missing pieces. This is what we call a fragmented clause. It's a group of words that has a subject and a verb but doesn't express a complete thought on its own. Think of it as a sentence that's not quite finished. These can sometimes pop up in writing, and understanding them helps make your sentences clearer and stronger. Want to learn more about making your writing shine? Visit our website for tips and tricks!
Wrapping Up: Smoother Sentences Ahead
So, there you have it. We've gone through a few ways to make those clunky sentences flow a bit better. It's not about being perfect, but about making your writing easier for people to read and understand. Think of these tips as tools in your toolbox. You don't need to use them all the time, but knowing they're there can really help when you get stuck. Keep practicing, and you'll start to notice the difference in your own writing. Happy writing!
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a comma splice, and how can I fix it?
A comma splice happens when you use only a comma to join two complete sentences. It's like trying to hold two separate ideas together with a weak link! To fix it, you can use a period to make them two sentences, add a conjunction (like 'and,' 'but,' or 'so') after the comma, or use a semicolon if the sentences are closely related.
How do I know if I have a run-on sentence?
A run-on sentence is when two or more complete sentences are mashed together without any punctuation or connecting words. It's like a train with too many cars all stuck together! You can fix it by splitting it into separate sentences, using conjunctions, or using punctuation like semicolons.
What's a dangling modifier, and why is it a problem?
A dangling modifier is a phrase that doesn't clearly connect to the word it's supposed to describe. For example, 'Walking down the street, the buildings looked tall.' Who is walking? The buildings? It's confusing! Make sure the modifier is right next to the word it's describing. So, it should be 'Walking down the street, I thought the buildings looked tall.'
Why should I avoid using the passive voice?
The passive voice can make your writing sound weak or unclear because it hides who is doing the action. For instance, 'The ball was thrown by John' is passive. It's better to say 'John threw the ball' (active voice). Active voice is usually more direct and engaging for the reader.
What does it mean for a phrase to be 'wordy'?
A wordy phrase uses more words than necessary to say something. Think of it as adding extra fluff that doesn't really add meaning. For example, instead of 'due to the fact that,' you can just say 'because.' Cutting out unnecessary words makes your writing stronger and easier to understand.
How is a misplaced modifier different from a dangling modifier?
Both make sentences confusing, but a misplaced modifier is just in the wrong spot. It's *near* the word it should describe, but not close enough. For example, 'I saw a dog on the way to the store that was barking.' Was the store barking? No! It should be 'On the way to the store, I saw a dog that was barking.'
.png)







Comments